• To: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <len.bullard@i...>
• Subject: Re: Concept Oriented Modeling
• From: "Peter Hunsberger" <peter.hunsberger@g...>
• Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2006 15:55:46 -0500
• Cc: xml-dev <xml-dev@l...>
• Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=VR2/xao6ITyQ51M7Bvkcq+zDfR9pN48gugzc0C2x8E3lo42SPpmkdtE67oohJ9RGxOlAvY9BeMnCcCBIG+3LyZKqv3clVEzjliNUKCT3e9Pmtu7lBZ57n7zQ3GVJ3B+fclZKwo12jWf+39ulhkHZWsctgE9vM0OmVaqbObztQa8=
• In-reply-to: <7411F30464DC9C479FB14CFD348D71D90848E1@U...>
• References: <7411F30464DC9C479FB14CFD348D71D90848E1@U...>

On 4/4/06, Bullard, Claude L (Len) <len.bullard@i...> wrote:
> http://conceptoriented.com/papers/ComInformalIntroduction.html
>
> XQuery, XPath and Semantic Web gurus will enjoy that article or not.
> If you like OLAP, you'll like it too.  XML for Analysis gurus might
> want to ask if Concept Graphs (the syntax model for concept oriented
> modeling) is another expression of this field of multi-dimensional/hierarchical
> hybrids.

Found a little time to read through this and as far as I can tell
there is nothing here of value what-so-ever.  A very
restricted/artificial form of graphs, and a hacked together query
language that appears to be blissfully unaware of the realities of
real world index issues.  Didn't pay that much attention, but I don't
really think I'm missing anything?

--
Peter Hunsberger

• References:
  • Concept Oriented Modeling
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L \(Len\)" <len.bullard@i...>

• Prev by Date: RE: defining xml diff/changes in xml : XUpdate etc
• Next by Date: RE: defining xml diff/changes in xml : XUpdate etc
• Previous by thread: Concept Oriented Modeling
• Next by thread: Re: DOM's javascript roots (was Re: Have JDOM / XOM / etc. failed?)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread