• To: Philippe Poulard <Philippe.Poulard@s...>
• Subject: Re: [XPath] is it legal ?
• From: Jeff Rafter <lists@j...>
• Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2006 11:01:32 -0700
• Cc: Michael Kay <mike@s...>, xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <4436A2AF.5050201@s...>
• References: <200604071604.k37G46hU006271@s...> <4436A2AF.5050201@s...>
• Reply-to: lists@j...
• User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201)

<snip>

> I'll try to support it
> 
> or a step of preceding-sibling::x[2].
> 
> ...but not this one ; only things that have not yet been read have a 
> chance to be resolved (however, a smart strategy that would accumulate 
> datas that would matches all candidate patterns could work ; I'll keep 
> things simple).

</snip>


One might argue that in the arena of forward based streaming processes, 
nothing has been read. I would assume that the XPaths used during the 
streaming would be pre-compiled and evaluated-- in which case, and 
according to your statement it could be resolved. I had anticipated that 
this is what you meant by caching.

Cheers,
Jeff Rafter

• References:
  • Re: [XPath] is it legal ?
    • From: Philippe Poulard <Philippe.Poulard@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: [XPath] is it legal ?
• Next by Date: DOM in Java
• Previous by thread: Re: [XPath] is it legal ?
• Next by thread: Re: [ubl-dev] Code List Value Validation
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread