• To: "Oleg A. Paraschenko" <olpa@x...>
• Subject: Re: Have JDOM / XOM / etc. failed? If so, why?
• From: Tatu Saloranta <cowtowncoder@y...>
• Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2006 10:34:01 -0700 (PDT)
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=ewiP2BsJ/FoHZtdyphJxa+G0xOZr9ITeWU8b6CajnJPCcuuobfJfqAaIolReQjni7ZST94TaFuRwkON2Zq79AG4NP/4HOFlRi4CQeL8U10l7n0Etppcb2bzQpP7F9daOzgcfCs8JwLpLm4XMmG76P2VGUx0U6nu0BVP4LWu2x6w= ;
• In-reply-to: <20060402193404.37d6047b.olpa@x...>

--- "Oleg A. Paraschenko" <olpa@x...> wrote:

...
> > But wouldn't the best way to know for sure be to
> try
> > them out?
> 
> Unfortunately, I don't have luxury of having time to
> try everything.

Yet you do have time to speculate on it without any
data, just opinions....

...
> In most applications, the actual DOM implementation
> is a second

Geez. Absolute not! Choosing the API may be secondary
issue, choosing implementation is anything but.
Otherwise you might just choose, Electric XML over
Xerces... or something equally silly.

-+ Tatu +-


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

• References:
  • Re: Have JDOM / XOM / etc. failed? If so, why?
    • From: "Oleg A. Paraschenko" <olpa@x...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Validation of missing elements in xml:
• Next by Date: Re: Have JDOM / XOM / etc. failed? If so, why?
• Previous by thread: Re: Have JDOM / XOM / etc. failed? If so, why?
• Next by thread: Re: Have JDOM / XOM / etc. failed? If so, why?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread