• To: <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: <offtopic /> Is The Web a Reciprocal System
• From: "Bullard, Claude L \(Len\)" <len.bullard@i...>
• Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2006 10:37:59 -0500
• Thread-index: AcZY5EhZsh7FfiKuQPeX2E2L6TV3EQAmtEiQAAP1zIA=
• Thread-topic: Have JDOM / XOM / etc. failed? If so, why?

In the great REST vs Services debates, it would 
be interesting to see if there is a description 
of the web architecture that doesn't include implicit 
or explicit concepts of motion.

Is it the case that URIs don't identify locations, 
or names, that identity is only a relationship 
and that we can't describe what we are doing 
with the web without using concepts of motion?

Have fun at Extreme this year.

len

See the Reciprocal Theories of Dewey Larson.
Start here

http://www.bautforum.com/showthread.php?t=30373

It's easier.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: <offtopic /> Is The Web a Reciprocal System
    • From: "M. David Peterson" <xmlhacker@g...>
  • Re: <offtopic /> Is The Web a Reciprocal System
    • From: Rick Marshall <rjm@z...>

• Prev by Date: <offtopic> Tiered Pricing for Free Web Services
• Next by Date: RE: Re: DOM's javascript roots (was Re: HaveJDOM / XOM / etc. failed?)
• Previous by thread: <offtopic> Tiered Pricing for Free Web Services
• Next by thread: Re: <offtopic /> Is The Web a Reciprocal System
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread