• To: "xml-dev@l..." <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: Namespaces, Xml Schema Whitespace normalization, xs:anyURI,and URILiterals in XPath 2.0
• From: Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@a...>
• Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2006 18:00:18 +1000
• In-reply-to: <442AE14D.3030706@j...>
• References: <20060329190841.6985.qmail@w...> <442AE14D.3030706@j...>
• User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.6 (X11/20040502)

For background material on anyURI in XSD see
 http://www.w3.org/2000/12/xmlschema-crcomments.html#pfiIURI

anyURI was needed because of the tardiness in the IRI specification.
Also, it was strongly felt that people expect and need a URI to be the 
thing you can
cut and paste from the address bar in a browser. Also XSD should follow
XML's practise in treating resolving system identifiers.

See  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Apr/0161.html
for other possibly interesting angles.

Cheers
Rick Jelliffe

• References:
  • RE: Namespaces, Xml Schema Whitespace normalization, xs:anyURI, and URILiterals in XPath 2.0
    • From: Michele Vivoda <idmichele@y...>
  • Re: Namespaces, Xml Schema Whitespace normalization, xs:anyURI,and URILiterals in XPath 2.0
    • From: Jeff Rafter <lists@j...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Don't you need an XML Virtual Machine ?
• Next by Date: Re: Don't you need an XML Virtual Machine ?
• Previous by thread: RE: Namespaces, Xml Schema Whitespace normalization, xs:anyURI, and URILiterals in XPath 2.0
• Next by thread: OASIS Symposium | Early-Bird Discount Ends This Week
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread