• To: XML Developers List <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: The Rule of Least Power - does it miss the point?
• From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@r...>
• Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 09:07:53 -0500
• In-reply-to: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE0BB1FF46@h...>
• References: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE0BB1FF46@h...>

> Information is transported subjective;y (least
> power, least authority) and objectified for
> local processing.

That's the key point, but this has always been so whenever  
information is exchanged.

My guess is that the authors are simply saying that wherever  
possible, encode data in a form that is amenable to automated  
analysis and transformation. That's common sense IMHO.

• References:
  • RE: Re: The Rule of Least Power - does it miss the point?
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L \(Len\)" <len.bullard@i...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Problems with CDATA
• Next by Date: RE: The Rule of Least Power - does it miss the point?
• Previous by thread: Re: Re: The Rule of Least Power - does it miss the point?
• Next by thread: RE: Re: The Rule of Least Power - does it miss the point?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread