• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Two Questions - on XML Schema
• From: David Carver <d_a_carver@y...>
• Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2006 14:19:23 -0500
• Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=6aOfWm2VffO4z8gJ8jbjIE0/f+ZB1JCbTZsJ/TtdwRA6r7zKdx0CwDxn4+cs8o3503IouUyP9EoQR9dxvU11u6epzaUTvRC3FXsxscIPj/TGV1PwIg0f/YqJ+JjRoHXCVoeWDth8Uk2D+UEmgJBIc/E6+h4IQzjVlTrhr4SDHzc= ;
• In-reply-to: <E1FHQT5-000736-83@a...>
• References: <E1FHQT5-000736-83@a...>
• Reply-to: d_a_carver@y...
• User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201)

Michael Kay wrote:
>> It is unclear how data binding tools would 
>> support the conditional assignment of types.  I'm not saying that it 
>> couldn't be done but I've yet to seen anyone spell out how to 
>> handle it. 
>>     
>
> Oh dear. If the data binding folks are going to be stakeholders in this, we
> can throw out all hopes of a clean design. They'll mess it up even worse
> than the relational people did.
>
> Michael Kay
> http://www.saxonica.com/
>   
I'll have to second that opinion.   I haven't seen an implementation of 
xml schemas databinding that is flexible enough to deal with changes to 
a schemas, without causing a lot of code rewrite.

• Prev by Date: RE: Two Questions - on XML Schema
• Next by Date: RE: Two Questions - on XML Schema
• Previous by thread: RE: Two Questions - on XML Schema
• Next by thread: RE: Two Questions - on XML Schema
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread