• To: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@e...>
• Subject: Re: DOM's javascript roots (was Re: Have JDOM/ XOM / etc. failed?)
• From: Elliotte Harold <elharo@m...>
• Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 15:45:25 -0500
• Cc: XML Developers List <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <39BC73F5-3EFF-4C4D-81E8-8EEE5344AF25@e...>
• References: <20060331181515.52963.qmail@w...> <26B5424A-181E-4A13-B9DB-4E63AD738AB0@e...> <442D7D27.8090204@m...> <39BC73F5-3EFF-4C4D-81E8-8EEE5344AF25@e...>
• User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Macintosh/20051201)

Robin Berjon wrote:

> Do you have an example of something in the DOM that hurts Java that was 
> obviously done so that Javascript would work? In the other direction, 
> you don't need to look any further than NodeList (not even counting the 
> liveness).
> 

Of course. No method overloading. Think createElement, createElementNS, 
etc. Java and C++ wouldn;t desing an API like that.

-- 
Elliotte Rusty Harold  elharo@m...
XML in a Nutshell 3rd Edition Just Published!
http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/xian3/
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0596007647/cafeaulaitA/ref=nosim

• References:
  • DOM's javascript roots (was Re: Have JDOM / XOM / etc. failed?)
    • From: Tatu Saloranta <cowtowncoder@y...>
  • Re: DOM's javascript roots (was Re: Have JDOM / XOM / etc. failed?)
    • From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@e...>
  • Re: DOM's javascript roots (was Re: Have JDOM/ XOM / etc. failed?)
    • From: Elliotte Harold <elharo@m...>
  • Re: DOM's javascript roots (was Re: Have JDOM / XOM / etc. failed?)
    • From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@e...>

• Prev by Date: Re: DOM's javascript roots (was Re: Have JDOM / XOM / etc. failed?)
• Next by Date: RE: DOM's javascript roots (was Re: Have JDOM / XOM / etc. failed?)
• Previous by thread: Re: DOM's javascript roots (was Re: Have JDOM / XOM / etc. failed?)
• Next by thread: Re: DOM's javascript roots (was Re: Have JDOM/ XOM / etc. failed?)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread