• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: UBL
• From: Dave Scott <dms@h...>
• Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2006 07:22:02 -0600
• In-reply-to: <3bb44c6e0603162332k5f16e65fn96a2d3492ee4c4f@m...>
• References: <E7CE732B-16F5-4501-8A40-9FA1C65FA3D8@h...> <3bb44c6e0603162332k5f16e65fn96a2d3492ee4c4f@m...>

On Mar 17, 2006, at 1:32 AM, bryan rasmussen wrote:
> Just wondering, did you post to xml-dev because you thought that
> getting an impartial response on any of the UBL lists would be
> difficult or because you wanted to get perspectives outside UBL?

The latter.  If this was a question about UBL implementation, I would  
have posted there.  I consider this more a question about XML schema  
design and how it affects processing.  Plus this is a list I've  
monitored off and on for years, and I'm interested in the perspective  
of its subscribers.

Dave

On Mar 17, 2006, at 1:32 AM, bryan rasmussen wrote:

• References:
  • UBL
    • From: Dave Scott <dms@h...>
  • Re: UBL
    • From: "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...>

• Prev by Date: Re: UBL
• Next by Date: Re: joining parallel markup
• Previous by thread: Re: UBL
• Next by thread: Re: UBL
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread