[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]


Jason Hunter wrote:
>> In some internal discussions of the XLinq http:// 
>> msdn.microsoft.com/netframework/future/linq/ project, I got a very  
>> interesting bit of devil's advocacy that went something like  
>> this:  "People complain about the DOM, but they don't embrace  
>> alternatives.  For all the work that people have done to provide  
>> alternatives such as JDOM, dom4j, XOM, etc. in the Java world, the  
>> typical users and the major Java players still use DOM, warts and  
>> all."   I'm not at all convinced this is true, but I don't have  
>> any information at my fingertips to dispute it.  Would anyone care  
>> to present facts on one side or the other?
>
> There's a poll at servlets.com that asked this question:
>
> http://www.servlets.com/polls/results.tea?name=doms

This resource gives a 500 response. It wouldn't be a J2EE app by any  
chance?
-- 
ç?¬ Chris Burdess
   "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little safety
   deserve neither liberty nor safety." - Benjamin Franklin





Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member