[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Jason Hunter wrote: >> In some internal discussions of the XLinq http:// >> msdn.microsoft.com/netframework/future/linq/ project, I got a very >> interesting bit of devil's advocacy that went something like >> this: "People complain about the DOM, but they don't embrace >> alternatives. For all the work that people have done to provide >> alternatives such as JDOM, dom4j, XOM, etc. in the Java world, the >> typical users and the major Java players still use DOM, warts and >> all." I'm not at all convinced this is true, but I don't have >> any information at my fingertips to dispute it. Would anyone care >> to present facts on one side or the other? > > There's a poll at servlets.com that asked this question: > > http://www.servlets.com/polls/results.tea?name=doms This resource gives a 500 response. It wouldn't be a J2EE app by any chance? -- ç?¬ Chris Burdess "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - Benjamin Franklin
|

Cart



