• To: "'Jim Melton'" <jim.melton@a...>,<ElektonikaMail@f...>
• Subject: RE: Two Questions - on XML Schema
• From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>
• Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 00:14:33 -0000
• Cc: <Paul.V.Biron@k...>,<ElektonikaMail@f...>,<rjelliffe@a...>,<xml-dev@l...>,<xmlschema-dev@w...>,<xmlschema-dev-request@w...>
• In-reply-to: <000201c643b2$13896950$0115a8c0@E...>
• Thread-index: AcZDshOJmDSxWVOATAGTeuezRUmtiAAJUxEg

> 
> Gee, Mike,
> 
> I'm truly flattered at your assertion that [we] relational 
> people messed up 
> some "clean design".  Didn't realize we had that much power. ;^)

Well, let's just say that I think we would have had a more coherent set of
basic data types if we hadn't had so many people throwing in their
ha'penceworth from diametrically opposite directions.

Come to think of it, the same is probably true of SQL.

Mike

• Prev by Date: RE: Re: The Rule of Least Power - does it miss the point?
• Next by Date: RE: Two Questions - on XML Schema
• Previous by thread: Re: Two Questions - on XML Schema
• Next by thread: RE: Two Questions - on XML Schema
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread