• To: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <len.bullard@i...>
• Subject: Re: Semantic Web for the Masses, by the Masses
• From: Peter Hunsberger <peter.hunsberger@g...>
• Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 12:41:59 -0600
• Cc: XML Developers List <xml-dev@l...>
• Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Ix2Yy/tq7KNJhdbjFwbrBoJbUeHflCUBvLOYKotIm0GkIfFwINWroPH/HszX6sKee767SRHfXM7v/VI6T4IbR4c3YDauzoSErknLQYqkCzzdxtvmTrFttP/lHtFrU021cmhgHsdescTdmHih+2F6j67ZlB2D7g6lxSDO754siis=
• In-reply-to: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE0BB1FD7D@h...>
• References: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE0BB1FD7D@h...>

On 1/13/06, Bullard, Claude L (Len) <len.bullard@i...> wrote:
> So, are we moving to a web of formally defined ontologies
> and bottom up ontologies being integrated dynamically?
>

Looks like a permathread [1].  Last time around I pontificated on "why
it is hard to transition from a local Ontology to a global Ontology". 
Don't think the issues have changed any in the last 13 months or so...
(IOW, yes, but not any time soon).

<snip>thread pushing</snip>

> That's enough to push this discussion into a fun place.

Somehow I suspect you didn't really want to hit on the permathread?
Fess up; pounding the eco metaphor was your real rational for
posting...

--
Peter Hunsberger

[1] http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/200411/msg00198.html

• References:
  • RE: Semantic Web for the Masses, by the Masses
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <len.bullard@i...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Semantic Web for the Masses, by the Masses
• Next by Date: Tools for transforming a multiple schema document into a single document?
• Previous by thread: RE: Semantic Web for the Masses, by the Masses
• Next by thread: RE: Semantic Web for the Masses, by the Masses
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread