• To: Richard Lainchbury <freexe@g...>
• Subject: Re: [Summary] Best Practice for URI construction?
• From: Philippe Poulard <Philippe.Poulard@s...>
• Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2006 16:09:48 +0100
• Cc: Pete Cordell <petexmldev@t...>, "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...>, XML Developers List <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <2cbc8d0a0512210816v610dd5aan@m...>
• References: <B8415163A689094689542C617ECA03665836EE@I...> <002701c60647$1c6fee20$b100a8c0@RW> <2cbc8d0a0512210816v610dd5aan@m...>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.7) Gecko/20050511

hi, and happy new year

Richard Lainchbury wrote:
> I presume that it is a illegal uri, but my thoughts are that it should
> be obvious enough not to be need.
> 
> http://www.example.com/country:US/state:MA/city:Boston

your browser will have some troubles if it has to resolve relative URIs
for example, resolving state:MA/city:Boston upon 
http://www.example.com/country:US/ will fail : your browser should warn 
you that the scheme "state" is unknown
moreover, this relative URI is not one : it is an opaque URI, not a 
hierarchical one

-- 
Cordialement,

            ///
           (. .)
  -----ooO--(_)--Ooo-----
|   Philippe Poulard    |
  -----------------------
http://reflex.gforge.inria.fr

• Prev by Date: Tradacom to XML
• Next by Date: XTECH 2006 Call for Papers Deadline -- Monday 9 January
• Previous by thread: Tradacom to XML
• Next by thread: XTECH 2006 Call for Papers Deadline -- Monday 9 January
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread