Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Thanks Len. To your mention of: > (eg, do web services of necessity rely on SOA and vice versa, Recognizing that you were not asking this, my answer is: no. One may have a SOA without Web Services, and Web Services without SOA. We mention this point somewhere in the SOA-RM spec. Joe Joseph Chiusano Associate Booz Allen Hamilton 700 13th St. NW, Suite 1100 Washington, DC 20005 O: 202-508-6514 C: 202-251-0731 Visit us online@ http://www.boozallen.com > -----Original Message----- > From: Bullard, Claude L (Len) [mailto:len.bullard@i...] > Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2006 11:09 AM > To: Chiusano Joseph; xml-dev@l... > Subject: RE: Will The Real SOA Please Sit Down? > > I think each has a use although one and two overlap. > They are not equally strong. It comes down to purposes and > the audience. One and two lead to conflicts of application > (eg, do web services of necessity rely on SOA and vice versa, > is REST and SOA, etc.), whereas the third is easy to explain > and currently a good pitch for selling systems because it > explains an approach to problems the majority of buyers have > at this time (sell to their pain). > > A recurring problem in our industry, particularly in the web > media, is embracing geekTalk for suitTalk when the geeks > disagree and the suits don't. The web is self-obsessed and > that exacerbates the problem as it encourages opportunistic behaviors. > > So your spec is most welcome, Joe, as it provides a single > citation instead of a 'see Google' response. > > http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/15966/wd-soa > -rm-11.pdf > > len > > > From: Chiusano Joseph [mailto:chiusano_joseph@b...] > > I would say that they are all correct, and all equally > useful. The best situation would be to have a single > definition that comprises all of these, as they each point > out valuable and important aspects of SOA. >
|
