• To: "'Nathan Young -X \(natyoung - Artizen at Cisco\)'" <natyoung@c...>,"'Bullard, Claude L \(Len\)'" <len.bullard@i...>,<davep@d...>
• Subject: RE: Common Word Processing Format
• From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>
• Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 13:34:05 -0000
• Cc: <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <0DF8CBE327D4654F8567FD8123E328B10110B40A@x...>
• Thread-index: AcX6tZd0PFKyclhES3SbS91v7tIrxwAADxCAAB8U8LA=

> 
> Using word is much easier than using emacs... but using word 
> and keeping
> it from breaking things is about as hard as using emacs.
> 

The number of times I have hunted high and low to find the magic button that
stops Word turning XPath into Xpath...

Worse though was when Word decided that when I typed the current date on an
invoice, what I really wanted was the date on which the document was
printed, thus effectively changing the date on which tax was due. The
arrogance of a software developer who does that kind of thing just amazes
me.

Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/

• References:
  • RE: Common Word Processing Format
    • From: "Nathan Young -X \(natyoung - Artizen at Cisco\)" <natyoung@c...>

• Prev by Date: RE: XPath count/contains
• Next by Date: Re: XPath count/contains
• Previous by thread: RE: Common Word Processing Format
• Next by thread: RE: Common Word Processing Format
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread