• To: "Nathan Young -X (natyoung - Artizen at Cisco)" <natyoung@c...>
• Subject: Re: Common Word Processing Format
• From: Robert Koberg <rob@k...>
• Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2005 18:35:37 -0500
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <0DF8CBE327D4654F8567FD8123E328B1010A5599@x...>
• References: <0DF8CBE327D4654F8567FD8123E328B1010A5599@x...>
• User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Macintosh/20041206)

Nathan Young -X (natyoung - Artizen at Cisco) wrote:

> Every tool I've used needs a LOT of maturing.  So much so that my
> assertion is that no practical tool exists at this time.  I'm actively
> evaluating solutions, and would love to be contradicted!

The best I have seen is Xopus (http://xopus.com). It is what we use for 
the editor in our CMS. It is the closest to Word that is out and lets 
you create whatever markup you want (as long as a schema is defined for 
it) - IE only. XStandard (http://xstandard.com/) is the best XHTML 
editor I have seen and allows you to create a psuedo schema. XStandard 
uses a plugin works on MS in IE and Mozilla and provides a really nice 
UI, but only creates XHTML.

best,
-Rob

• References:
  • RE: Common Word Processing Format
    • From: "Nathan Young -X \(natyoung - Artizen at Cisco\)" <natyoung@c...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Common Word Processing Format
• Next by Date: Fwd: Common Word Processing Format
• Previous by thread: RE: Common Word Processing Format
• Next by thread: RE: Common Word Processing Format
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread