• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: RE: Common Word Processing Format
• From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>
• Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2005 12:32:51 -0700
• In-reply-to: <1133551690.15399.210.camel@borgia>
• Organization: Fourthought, Inc.
• References: <0DF8CBE327D4654F8567FD8123E328B1010A549B@x...> <1133551690.15399.210.camel@borgia>

On Fri, 2005-12-02 at 12:28 -0700, Uche Ogbuji wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-12-02 at 11:14 -0800, Nathan Young -X (natyoung - Artizen
> Umm.  CSS works perfectly well with custom XML, thank you very much,
> and this is supported on almost all browsers.

Man.  I'm slipping.  How could I have missed such a plug opportunity?

Ahem...

If you still don't believe me you can see for yourself in my three
tutorials on custom XML+CSS:

http://copia.ogbuji.net/blog/2005-06-21/XSLT___CSS


-- 
Uche Ogbuji                               Fourthought, Inc.
http://uche.ogbuji.net                    http://fourthought.com
http://copia.ogbuji.net                   http://4Suite.org
Articles: http://uche.ogbuji.net/tech/publications/

• References:
  • RE: Common Word Processing Format
    • From: "Nathan Young -X \(natyoung - Artizen at Cisco\)" <natyoung@c...>
  • RE: Common Word Processing Format
    • From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Common Word Processing Format
• Next by Date: RE: Common Word Processing Format
• Previous by thread: RE: Common Word Processing Format
• Next by thread: Re: Common Word Processing Format
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread