[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]


On Fri, 2005-12-02 at 16:56 -0800, Nathan Young -X (natyoung - Artizen
at Cisco) wrote:
> On the flip side I'd certainly want to avoid using XHTML + semantics
> tunneled through attributes for anything that wasn't already and always
> to be a web page... hence my objection to boom, and to XHTML used as a
> WP format.

A ha.  This in a nutshell is my position.  Violent agreement.


-- 
Uche Ogbuji                               Fourthought, Inc.
http://uche.ogbuji.net                    http://fourthought.com
http://copia.ogbuji.net                   http://4Suite.org
Articles: http://uche.ogbuji.net/tech/publications/


Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member