• To: "Michael Good" <musicxml@g...>, <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: MusicXML 1.1 saving from Sibelius; XML document adoption rates?
• From: "Len Bullard" <cbullard@h...>
• Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 12:32:50 -0600
• Importance: Normal
• In-reply-to: <b5ca83430512201634j39469493xdcf3bb8004d742ad@m...>

From: Michael Good [mailto:musicxml@g...]

Today Recordare released our Dolet 3 for Sibelius plug-in. It allows the Sibelius 4 music notation program to save MusicXML 1.1 files so they can be shared with people who use Finale, Notion, and many other music notation programs. More information is available at:

 

  http://store.recordare.com/dolet3sib.html

 

With this release, people can now use the MusicXML 1.1 format to exchange editable files between the two main market leaders in music notation software (Finale and Sibelius) with a higher level of fidelity than has ever been possible.

 

We now have 50 applications supporting the MusicXML format - including the commercial market leaders, innovative new products, and open source projects. So I am curious as to how MusicXML measures up against other document-oriented XML projects. Are there studies that compare adoption rates of XML document formats by software in different application areas? Pointers to such work would be most welcome!

 

I hope everyone has a great holiday season and new year.

 

Best regards,

 

Michael Good

Recordare LLC

http://www.recordare.com

 

• References:
  • MusicXML 1.1 saving from Sibelius; XML document adoption rates?
    • From: Michael Good <musicxml@g...>

• Prev by Date: Re: [Summary] Best Practice for URI construction?
• Next by Date: Re: [Summary] Best Practice for URI construction?
• Previous by thread: RE: MusicXML 1.1 saving from Sibelius; XML document adoption rates?
• Next by thread: Re: MusicXML 1.1 saving from Sibelius; XML document adoption rates?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread