• To: Michael Kay <mike@s...>
• Subject: Re: Common Word Processing Format
• From: bryan rasmussen <rasmussen.bryan@g...>
• Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2005 10:26:58 +0100
• Cc: Uche Ogbuji <Uche.Ogbuji@f...>, "Nathan Young -X (natyoung - Artizen at Cisco)" <natyoung@c...>, Robert Koberg <rob@k...>, Peter Hunsberger <peter.hunsberger@g...>, "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <len.bullard@i...>, xml-dev@l...
• Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=DfH5qwDSFY5er4l3RJED48dYUHxhoZmJFQTWaAiHy2iGj17cFNxZymNzsYGSHrCgRoo2E+058bHhco00mVb3172sm3h/mZqqfxGg1F/51NKt4DuxgfHvogTFpIU3igGyAAfgx47lwn7/yTQAApFuKhyM4p0JykkHGl50Q5saM28=
• In-reply-to: <4390127e.6f741688.14de.ffff90feSMTPIN_ADDED@m...>
• References: <1133490821.15399.82.camel@borgia> <4390127e.6f741688.14de.ffff90feSMTPIN_ADDED@m...>

> I've recently seen people trying to use the latter approach for adding
> extensibility to financial messages, in the apparent belief that writing
> xs:any in a schema was somehow against the spirit of things.
>
Any, uh, Financial messaging format in particular in mind here?
:)

Cheers,
Bryan Rasmussen

• References:
  • RE: Common Word Processing Format
    • From: Uche Ogbuji <Uche.Ogbuji@f...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Common Word Processing Format
• Next by Date: Re: How to create "strict" flag for schema?
• Previous by thread: RE: Common Word Processing Format
• Next by thread: Re: Common Word Processing Format
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread