• To: <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: Automated schema migration, conclusion
• From: "Renaud Waldura" <renaud+xml@w...>
• Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 10:43:32 -0800
• References: <20051109220531.E7D835AC3@h...> <002a01c5e58a$9f8f1890$945fae0a@C...> <1487063356.20051110115431@j...>

Got it. Thanks everyone for their answers.

To sum it up: it doesn't sound like it would be easy and/or been done before 
(which would make it easier). It's probably better to write the 2 schemas 
and any transformation (XSLT) independently.

So I'll drop it. Thanks again!

--Renaud

• References:
  • Re: Automated schema migration
    • From: "Renaud Waldura" <renaud+xml@w...>
  • Re: Automated schema migration
    • From: Jeni Tennison <jeni@j...>

• Prev by Date: Announce: XSL training and no-charge UBL to PDF formatting announced at XML'2005 (XML Dev)
• Next by Date: Key constraint on optional attribute
• Previous by thread: Re: Automated schema migration
• Next by thread: RE: Automated schema migration
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread