[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
On 11/29/05, Michael Kay <mike@s...> wrote: > > Sure, a relational database might not be the best fit for a given > > hierarchical structure. But for other cases the fit may be as good or > > better than any other database.... > > I was under the impression the OP was trying to design a relational database > to hold arbitrary XML documents, not to hold a specific document. In other > words, to implement a hierarchical database on top of a relational database. Could be, given his examples I assumed otherwise... > I don't think that's a good way of implementing a hierarchical database. I > apologize that I don't have time to write a detailed rationale for that > view, but it's based on a lot of experience, including expensive failures of > projects that tried to do exactly that. No need for a rationale. I'd agree that for arbitrary documents, even with XML Schema's generalized mapping to a RDB is a hard problem that is unlikely to yield good results in most cases. -- Peter Hunsberger
|

Cart



