• To: Michael Kay <mike@s...>
• Subject: Re: Indexing solution for native XML database
• From: Peter Hunsberger <peter.hunsberger@g...>
• Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 09:35:24 -0600
• Cc: Ken North <kennorth@s...>, xml-dev@l...
• Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=ZYkYXR3FhfMFWiMUZjPHoSI3cUan7evpTZ1EsTD1908uwGbfYf3aR4eQcR5x8QYZGVf4qpMj8BcaGWrvVlWhV230KCWpTKNjh0KBul9mNAkQoVp0IvHzSfdZArsFfHqWqGPp6nkzSN4uPZNQPIuT7Fx3Jj+HMWn6Q54fK/OqVgI=
• In-reply-to: <20051129230950.4B72A60A062@m...>
• References: <001101c5f52e$a2ae4d80$1601a8c0@DURANTE> <20051129230950.4B72A60A062@m...>

On 11/29/05, Michael Kay <mike@s...> wrote:
> > Joe Celko's article about the adjacency list approach for
> > processing hierarchies
> > with SQL:
> > http://www.sqlsummit.com/AdjacencyList.htm
>
> Celko often writes about this approach to prove that it can be done, but it
> just goes to convince me that it shouldn't be done.
>

Ok, I'll bite: care to explain?  Is it just the simple forms of
adjacency list you don't like or all nested set approaches?

--
Peter Hunsberger

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Indexing solution for native XML database
    • From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>

• References:
  • Re: Indexing solution for native XML database
    • From: "Ken North" <kennorth@s...>
  • RE: Indexing solution for native XML database
    • From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Indexing solution for native XML database
• Next by Date: OASIS Symposium - Call for Participation
• Previous by thread: Re: Indexing solution for native XML database
• Next by thread: RE: Indexing solution for native XML database
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread