• To: Tech Rams <techmailing@y...>
• Subject: Re: Non-schema approach to web service design: comments?
• From: bryan rasmussen <rasmussen.bryan@g...>
• Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 21:13:44 +0200
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=DcW8hSCS6xoX3Mx1wxM73esKMEjw/2gTzqwJZKYsbp3PINYJ+/M2R2R+b7jUKbJektk2DQgLlpay8f25i5+Ubn95XbozgnAQUu+OoNkXtm3OjdoC5zT0SXw5dTr9WuHjC63MBV/oHfkR6xgI2piYZ31stS/Fm8MUQc1zy9DiDv4=
• In-reply-to: <20051028163614.4147.qmail@w...>
• References: <1130469320.436197c82e733@w...> <20051028163614.4147.qmail@w...>

On 10/28/05, Tech Rams <techmailing@y...> wrote:
> What is in the contract that you are
> not able to express in WSDL/XSD?

You can't be serious, the limitations of XML Schema are so maddening
and far reaching that one could fill books up just discussing the
limitations. A full library could be added of books just addressing
the limitations of various processors in implementing the spec. And a
final set of encyclopedia brittanicas could be issued filled with
quotes of really smart XML Gurus saying they don't understand it.

and that's just XML Schema.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Non-schema approach to web service design: comments?
    • From: Michael Champion <michaelc.champion@g...>

• References:
  • Re: Non-schema approach to web service design: comments?
    • From: ian.graham@u...
  • Re: Non-schema approach to web service design: comments?
    • From: Tech Rams <techmailing@y...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Non-schema approach to web service design: comments?
• Next by Date: Re: Non-schema approach to web service design: comments?
• Previous by thread: Re: Non-schema approach to web service design: comments?
• Next by thread: Re: Non-schema approach to web service design: comments?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread