• To: Martin Probst <martin@x...>
• Subject: RE: Small company makes big claims on XML patents
• From: Rich Salz <rsalz@d...>
• Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 07:58:49 -0400 (EDT)
• Cc: "xml-dev@l..." <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <1130145856.14439.25.camel@l...>

> means that your invention may not be completely trivial but must reach a
> certain complexity to be patentable.
>
> Is there something comparable in American patent law?

Yes; it must be innovative and not obvious to one "skilled in the arts."

The patent examiners are supposed to determine this.  For software, in
particular, the demand seems to exceed the competence.

	/r$

-- 
Rich Salz                  Chief Security Architect
DataPower Technology       http://www.datapower.com
This address will be going away; please use rsalz@u...

• References:
  • RE: Small company makes big claims on XML patents
    • From: Martin Probst <martin@x...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Small company makes big claims on XML patents
• Next by Date: Re: Canonical XML
• Previous by thread: RE: Small company makes big claims on XML patents
• Next by thread: RE: Small company makes big claims on XML patents
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread