[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]


Henry Luo wrote:

> We may want to look at the history of high level programming languages. 
> The early languages like Fortran and Basic were not strong-typed. But as 
> C come out to be strong-typed, people realize the benefits, it helps 
> avoid mistakes in the code.

Bad analogy: it's becoming more and more obvious that dynamically typed 
languages like Python are the wave of the future. C is statically but 
weakly typed. I do think the analogy has some relevance, though I'm not 
sure how much; but it actually suggests that we should avoid strong, 
static typing in XML; not that we should add it.

-- 
Elliotte Rusty Harold  elharo@m...
XML in a Nutshell 3rd Edition Just Published!
http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/xian3/
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0596007647/cafeaulaitA/ref=nosim

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member