• To: Mail <mail@v...>
• Subject: Re: XML-with-datatypes (was....)
• From: Rich Salz <rsalz@d...>
• Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 09:36:29 -0400 (EDT)
• Cc: 'XML DEV' <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <434E5FAD.9080603@v...>

> However, I don't think it is really that hard to extend XML further to
> make it strong typed.

Sure.  32 or 64 bit ints?  32 or 64 or Cray format floats?  Corba, COM,
Java, or C# object model?  Multiple inheritance?

> XML was initially designed without Namespace, and it is now patched with
> namespace and everyone is happy to accept it.

"everyone is happy to accept it"?  You're new to this, aren't you.

	/r$

-- 
Rich Salz                  Chief Security Architect
DataPower Technology       http://www.datapower.com
XS40 XML Security Gateway  http://www.datapower.com/products/xs40.html

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: XML-with-datatypes (was....)
    • From: Henry Luo <henryluo@v...>

• References:
  • Re: XML-with-datatypes (was....)
    • From: Mail <mail@v...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XML-with-datatypes (was....)
• Next by Date: Re: XML-with-datatypes (was....)
• Previous by thread: Re: XML-with-datatypes (was....)
• Next by thread: Re: XML-with-datatypes (was....)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread