• To: Peter Hunsberger <peter.hunsberger@g...>
• Subject: Re: Better design: "flatter is better" or "nesting isbetter" ?
• From: Dave Pawson <davep@d...>
• Date: Sat, 01 Oct 2005 10:37:06 +0100
• Cc: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...>, XML Developers List <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <cc159a4a0509301234533910b3@m...>
• References: <827BC324B431954A855DC4E39E71B02874BDF0@I...> <cc159a4a0509301234533910b3@m...>
• Reply-to: davep@d...

On Fri, 2005-09-30 at 14:34 -0500, Peter Hunsberger wrote:


> 
> 3) presentation specific structures that reflect some (perhaps
> abstract) denormalized, hierarchical presentation model.

I don't know of any hierarchical presentation models Peter, do you?
Unless you mean docbook or similar, which I don't see as presentation
layer.

Most of the presentation formats I know of are pretty flat.

regards DaveP.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Better design: "flatter is better" or "nesting is better" ?
    • From: Peter Hunsberger <peter.hunsberger@g...>

• Next by Date: Advice on WYSIWYG XSLT designer for ERP forms printing
• Next by thread: Re: Better design: "flatter is better" or "nesting is better" ?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread