[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]


* Henri Sivonen wrote:
>I think specifying character entities in a DTD and expecting them to be 
>supported is a serious spec but in XHTML 1.x. Carrying this over to 
>XHTML 2.0 means that the HTML WG is in denial about the relationship of 
>DTDs and interactive user agents and wants to wish the consequences of 
>the XML spec away.

Does the HTML Working Group believe in such bugs in the XML specs?
http://hades.mn.aptest.com/cgi-bin/xhtml2-issues/DocType?id=7336

  I would suggest something like this:
  
  <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
  <!SCHEMA xhtml PUBLIC "-//W3C//SCHEMA XHTML 2.0//EN"
       "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml2/SCHEMA/xhtml2.sch">
  <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" lang="en-US"
  xml:lang="en-US">
  
  We would need to get approval for the <!SCHEMA
  
  [...]

  Talking with Beth and Ann a little, how about something like:
  
  <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "whatever" SYSTEM "foo.xsd" TYPE
  "application/xml-schema" SYSTEM "foo.dtd" TYPE "application/xml-dtd" ...
  >
  
  This is an extension, and would need to be in an update to XML, so we
  would need to REQUIRE a new version of XML to support this:

It's always easy to make a new version of XML.
-- 
Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@h... · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de
68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/ 

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member