• To: Michael Kay <mike@s...>, 'xml dev' <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: basic qs - how is xml more flexible for exchanging data?
• From: Anil Philip <goodnewsforyou@y...>
• Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 13:10:50 -0700 (PDT)
• Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=hRSM9g/IKnD1mcr/ebovsKQmP7hYSxZBKL++aoR5o5hZ7vy7s1b6yfTemWO+7XGz/LKEuSCFmzia8BoEYQYeNUsICkRIRgONTS0FQIgK2MOCiZbsaPz8wZdqRNknO61V8gWDAlwA97TgQbz7aAyuf0MxqiE77AeAuR+rfnxf47Y= ;

I dont think you understood the post - I meant when
one transfers binary data (in a file or stream). I am
not referring to C compilers and it's not about
metadata or validation. Where are you now?

--- Michael Kay <mike@s...> wrote:

> Two C compilers on different architectures would
> represent that structure
> quite differently. There's no data interchange there
> at all except between
> identical machines with identical compilers running
> identical applications;
> there's no scope for attaching metadata to the
> message; there's no scope for
> validation... Where have you been all these years?
> 
> Michael Kay
> http://www.saxonica.com/
> 
> 
> 



		
__________________________________ 
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 
http://mail.yahoo.com

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: basic qs - how is xml more flexible for exchanging data?
    • From: Tech Rams <techmailing@y...>
  • RE: basic qs - how is xml more flexible for exchanging data?
    • From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>

• Prev by Date: RE: basic qs - how is xml more flexible for exchanging data?
• Next by Date: RE: basic qs - how is xml more flexible for exchanging data?
• Previous by thread: RE: basic qs - how is xml more flexible for exchanging data?
• Next by thread: RE: basic qs - how is xml more flexible for exchanging data?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread