Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Seems to me a good set of graphics cards with new and better video cards could do wonders for 3d. Do we really need a better packet transport technology than packets ? On Thu, 30 Jun 2005, Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote: > Thanks Jeff and Bill. > > Apparently, any media type developed with internal scripting > is a candidate for exploitation. That's painful. Almost > every media type that is fun to do has that as a feature. > > I was asking originally because a fellow BoD member for the > W3DC (X3D) asked about putting 3D worlds inside RSS. It is > a great idea, but then we have to cope with the kiddies and > the criminals. > > This is interesting reading. > > http://www.wired.com/news/infostructure/0,1377,68004,00.html?tw=rss.TOP > > It corresponds to the darker thoughts I've had since 1989. The only > really safe approach is to recognize the Internet is inherently insecure > and start over with the humbling knowledge that we have to plan for > the dark and dumb sides of human nature when building world wide > systems. So yeah, let's put a semantic engine on top of the current > system and see what they do with that given the unreasonable way > people accept whatever comes out of these boxes. > > Off tomorrow. Happy 4th to those to whom that is a happy day... as > for the Brits, TDBYRCBs! :-) > > len > > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an > initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org> > > The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/ > > To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription > manager: <http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/index.php> >
|
