• To: "'Mark O. Zorro'" <markozorro@f...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: Why this restriction? (was Constraining a "mixed" mixed content model (XHTML <div>))
• From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>
• Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 16:45:20 +0100
• In-reply-to: <1126536990.29765.242713147@w...>
• Thread-index: AcW3qmzx+IQktiZiTfuk0ohyqAmtHwABjYJg

> 
> To answer your last question first, I do not wish to add any new
> elements to the XHTML vocabulary I'm now using. So I'm stuck with
> having to use XHTML <div>.

It's your choice.
> 
> Now, to comment on your reply, which does seem to be right (where in
> the XML 1.0 spec does it specifically say DTDs are not allowed to
> constrain as I'd like it to?)

Section 3.2.2, specifically the syntax of production 51.
> 
> From a philosophical perspective, I find it sort of perplexing why
> there is this seeming limitation imposed upon DTDs. 

There's a lot of history here, but I'm not well versed in it.

Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/

• References:
  • Why this restriction? (was Constraining a "mixed" mixed content model (XHTML <div>))
    • From: "Mark O. Zorro" <markozorro@f...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Ref. Translation of ERD to XSD
• Next by Date: RE: Responding to Katrina (offtopic even if XML is partof the soluti on)
• Previous by thread: Why this restriction? (was Constraining a "mixed" mixed content model (XHTML <div>))
• Next by thread: Re: Why this restriction? (was Constraining a "mixed" mixed content model
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread