• To: "'Bullard, Claude L \(Len\)'" <len.bullard@i...>,"'Robin Berjon'" <robin.berjon@e...>
• Subject: RE: Is Web 2.0 the new XML?
• From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>
• Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 15:28:00 +0100
• Cc: <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE0720727D@h...>
• Thread-index: AcWkAG8MQJnT4UKkS5OXJoumc+W19QAAFNkA

> Pay reputable professionals to design critical components.
> 
> It works for business.  It isn't grassroots and it doesn't 
> make for media-likable myths.  It does work.
> 

It sometimes creates successes and it sometimes creates failures, but it
rarely creates standards.

In fact, standards committees that are stuffed with paid consultants are the
least successful, in my experience.

Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/

• References:
  • RE: Is Web 2.0 the new XML?
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <len.bullard@i...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Is Web 2.0 the new XML?
• Next by Date: RE: Is Web 2.0 the new XML?
• Previous by thread: RE: Is Web 2.0 the new XML?
• Next by thread: RE: Is Web 2.0 the new XML?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread