• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Talking of HTML.... Anyone like lock-in?
• From: Dave Pawson <davep@d...>
• Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 18:09:41 +0100
• Reply-to: davep@d...

http://copia.ogbuji.net/blog/2005/08/10#Today_s_XM

I guess it is biassed.
 I support that bias.

http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-xhtml2-20050527/conformance.html#strict
But ... .even XML doesn't *require* the DTD to be included.

I'm with Uche on this one.
What were they (the WG) doing!... or smoking?

regards DaveP

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Talking of HTML.... Anyone like lock-in?
    • From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@e...>
  • Re: Talking of HTML.... Anyone like lock-in?
    • From: Bob Foster <bob@o...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Is HTML structured or unstructured information?
• Next by Date: Re: Talking of HTML.... Anyone like lock-in?
• Previous by thread: [ANN] early version of the XML Query Test Suite
• Next by thread: Re: Talking of HTML.... Anyone like lock-in?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread