• To: joe@r..., xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Demand for web services
• From: Mukul Gandhi <mukul_gandhi@y...>
• Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2005 10:15:07 -0700 (PDT)
• Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=xGosPlp9uMdcvpCytteZWkCLC5y8FCOrVSC7hatq/esNaIrgS17RN/WDcTyOYGxv8XRfYd02m5OEk380JPupzw/8YB0ZTuNt+rw148SMIQlhIEg5nY/7+wU0OwCtq2gmXyyqErIVQS46qPK0OI+PZnXHYmxOK9qi+VPGTkS9Eok= ;
• In-reply-to: <BAY106-F19F8DFC74507B61E14AC89D9C30@p...>

--- Joe Fawcett <joefawcett@h...> wrote:
> Do you agree with him that this was not one of the
> driving forces or should 
> I stick to my guns?

According to me Web Services are popular because we
are able to *publish them in a registry* and *discover
their address at run time*. I think this point is in
deep favour of web services. Where as other paradigms
like HTTP (or CGI) require us to to know where we want
to publish the site and fetch the contents.

(IMHO), I also think XML is a nice protocol to
negotiate protocol information between Requestor,
Publisher and Invoker of Web Server (i.e. this
triangle of peers).

Regards,
Mukul

> Thanks
> 
> Joe



		
__________________________________ 
Yahoo! Mail for Mobile 
Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Check email on your mobile phone. 
http://mobile.yahoo.com/learn/mail 

• References:
  • Demand for web services
    • From: "Joe Fawcett" <joefawcett@h...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Demand for web services
• Next by Date: RE: Demand for web services
• Previous by thread: Re: Demand for web services
• Next by thread: Re: Rebuild XML file and merge
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread