• To: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@e...>
• Subject: Re: Avoding a repeat of W3C XSD - was Re: Is Web 2.0 the new XML?
• From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@g...>
• Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 23:33:46 +0200
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <43064D8B.3060204@e...>
• References: <1124469968.3639.2.camel@marge> <1124470975.3639.12.camel@marge> <e3a5cb2c0508191030af38a5a@m...> <43064D8B.3060204@e...>

* Robin Berjon wrote:
>Those groups would be called XGs (I can't recall what the 'X' meant, 
>assuming it meant anything), formerly known as Incubator Groups.

http://www.w3.org/Icons/XGR suggests that's not "formerly" and the X
stands for "We can't use I because IGs already exist and X is cool".
In http://www.w3.org/2004/Talks/0303-sb-techplenary/slide9-0.html the
"Aggressive schedule" makes me smile though...
-- 
Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@h... · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de
68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/ 

• References:
  • RE: Avoding a repeat of W3C XSD - was Re: Is Web 2.0 the new XML?
    • From: Dave Pawson <davep@d...>
  • Re: Avoding a repeat of W3C XSD - was Re: Is Web 2.0 the new XML?
    • From: Michael Champion <michaelc.champion@g...>
  • Re: Avoding a repeat of W3C XSD - was Re: IsWeb 2.0 the new XML?
    • From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@e...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Avoding a repeat of W3C XSD - was Re: IsWeb 2.0 the new XML?
• Next by Date: RE: Avoding a repeat of W3C XSD - was Re: Is Web 2.0 the new XML?
• Previous by thread: Re: Avoding a repeat of W3C XSD - was Re: IsWeb 2.0 the new XML?
• Next by thread: Re: Avoding a repeat of W3C XSD - was Re: IsWeb 2.0 the new XML?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread