• To: <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: Is HTML structured or unstructured information?
• From: "Jelks Cabaniss" <jelks@j...>
• Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2005 18:34:49 -0400
• In-reply-to: <6.2.0.14.2.20050809100010.02f3aee0@r...>
• Thread-index: AcWdAfwZtRmpdP1yT9yO0vrPzUf32AALEO1Q

Jim Melton wrote:
> Unstructured data is...well, unstructured.  A decent example is the
> text of this email message.  You might perceive structure, such as
> paragraphs and sentences, but those are artifacts of my use of common
> English/Western conventions, not actual structure.  

Yes and no.  Take a look at Markdown[1], which uses this very "perceived
structure" of plaintext emails to generate XHTML.

> And, most importantly, there is no single "thing" that you can 
> identify that is required, optional, or prohibited in this message.  
> There is no structure at all. 

Then schema-less XML has no structure?


[1]: http://daringfireball.net/projects/markdown/


/Jelks

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Is HTML structured or unstructured information?
    • From: Greg Hunt <greg@f...>

• References:
  • RE: Is HTML structured or unstructured information?
    • From: Jim Melton <jim.melton@a...>

• Prev by Date: ANN: Amara XML Toolkit 1.0
• Next by Date: Is Web 2.0 the new XML?
• Previous by thread: Re: Is HTML structured or unstructured information?
• Next by thread: Re: Is HTML structured or unstructured information?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread