• To: "'Mukul Gandhi'" <mukul_gandhi@y...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: Can we treat XML elements and attributes as sets
• From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>
• Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2005 13:10:01 +0100
• In-reply-to: <20050821040731.86975.qmail@w...>
• Thread-index: AcWmBdZHFo5q/3QnS8Ksmw793NKwWwAQxtEw

> Thanks Mike for clarification, and more information..
> I did'nt knew namespace URIs could be null.

The namespace URI property of an element or attribute node can be null,
meaning that the element or attribute is "not in a namespace". What I'm
saying is that it's often more convenient to regard such elements/attributes
as being in a namespace, a namespace with no name, and Elliotte's model
which you quoted seems to treat them that way.

Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/

• References:
  • RE: Can we treat XML elements and attributes as sets
    • From: Mukul Gandhi <mukul_gandhi@y...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Schematron 1.6 with Jing?
• Next by Date: RE: Can we treat XML elements and attributes as sets
• Previous by thread: RE: Can we treat XML elements and attributes as sets
• Next by thread: Re: Can we treat XML elements and attributes as sets
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread