• To: "Bullard, Claude L \(Len\)" <len.bullard@i...>,"Michael Kay" <mike@s...>,"Robin Berjon" <robin.berjon@e...>
• Subject: RE: Is Web 2.0 the new XML?
• From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 15:00:12 -0700
• Cc: <xml-dev@l...>
• Thread-index: AcWkAJLvWGy7OUzbRCeWezzkA7gaLQAP2rvw
• Thread-topic: Is Web 2.0 the new XML?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bullard, Claude L (Len) [mailto:len.bullard@i...] 
> Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2005 7:24 AM
> To: 'Michael Kay'; 'Robin Berjon'
> Cc: xml-dev@l...
> Subject: RE:  Is Web 2.0 the new XML?
> 
> Pay reputable professionals to design critical components.
> 
> It works for business.  It isn't grassroots and it doesn't 
> make for media-likable myths.  It does work.

Professional standards people? The XSD working group was full of them
and I personally think this is one of the reasons it was a disaster. A
bunch of academics with no stake in the success of the technology since
they weren't building products OR did not accurately represent their
constituency on thew orking group. 


--
PITHY WORDS OF WISDOM 
They say that 74% of the Earth is covered by water and the rest is
covered by mortgages. 

This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights.  

• Prev by Date: Re: Avoding a repeat of W3C XSD - was Re: Is
• Next by Date: Re: Avoding a repeat of W3C XSD - was Re: Is Web 2.0 the new XML?
• Previous by thread: RE: Is Web 2.0 the new XML?
• Next by thread: RE: Is Web 2.0 the new XML?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread