[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

  • To: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <len.bullard@i...>
  • Subject: Re: Names As Types
  • From: Peter Hunsberger <peter.hunsberger@g...>
  • Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2005 11:42:21 -0500
  • Cc: XML Developers List <xml-dev@l...>
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=cnK4U4tAL6DTLrInQLdYkt5UCZr60pLGdCXZbjPooz+uWE2k5eqC1tx82l3O9/Mg1IYcXlcZUCooKnvrttiPR2HuNbaF25RzRFVo3ZAjYuZsfhMqOxJhTuWRIyE4vQJKBspXJqlzPRM/y+p+wi3Q0gGXw3bUrymQYWonYk8gr1E=
  • In-reply-to: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE072072C5@h...>
  • References: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE072072C5@h...>

On 8/24/05, Bullard, Claude L (Len) <len.bullard@i...> asked:

> If names don't label types, what do we have them for?
 
Syntactic hooks to better enable us to argue semantics?

Oh, look, a "circular definition"... ;-)

-- 
Peter Hunsberger

  • References:
Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member