• To: 'Peter Hunsberger' <peter.hunsberger@g...>
• Subject: RE: Is HTML structured or unstructured information?
• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <len.bullard@i...>
• Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 09:42:59 -0500
• Cc: xml-dev@l...

Blew it. The question is, how to rate 
tools for turning unstructured information 
into structured information when both 
vary by notation and content type, and 
the use of the results varies by task.

On the limb:  so far, the IBM contribution 
looks pretty good except for having to 
recode it.

len


From: Bullard, Claude L (Len) 

If we can steer this back to the topic, how would one rate 
tools for turning unstructured information (whatever that 
means (It varies by notation and content type))?  The UIMA 
contribution provides an architecture and some code.  

A rough metric I use is to ask myself, is it worth recoding that 
into another language? 

• Prev by Date: RE: Is Web 2.0 the new XML?
• Next by Date: Re: Is Web 2.0 the new XML?
• Previous by thread: RE: Is HTML structured or unstructured information?
• Next by thread: RE: Is HTML structured or unstructured information?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread