• To: "XML Developers List" <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: Names As Types
• From: "Rick Jelliffe" <rjelliffe@a...>
• Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 11:06:01 +1000 (EST)
• Importance: Normal
• In-reply-to: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE072072FB@h...>
• References: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE072072FB@h...>
• User-agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.2

Bullard, Claude L (Len) said:
> So the bottom turtle is strictly syntax.  XML
> has no application semantics.  This we know.

My point is that the second turtle is missing!
This is creating difficulties for the others.

Cheers
Rick Jelliffe

• References:
  • RE: Names As Types
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <len.bullard@i...>

• Prev by Date: Substitution Groups - Use 'em or lose 'em?
• Next by Date: RE: Substitution Groups - Use 'em or lose 'em?
• Previous by thread: RE: Names As Types
• Next by thread: RE: Names As Types
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread