• To: Richard Tobin <richard@i...>
• Subject: Re: Can we treat XML elements and attributes as sets
• From: Bob Foster <bob@o...>
• Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 15:08:06 -0700
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <20050823205040.7C69B4E1F8B@m...>
• References: <20050823205040.7C69B4E1F8B@m...>
• User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317)

Richard Tobin wrote:
> In article <430B5D83.70509@o...> you write:
>>Elements don't have kinds or types, they just have names.
> 
> But note that the XML spec, following SGML, uses the term "element
> type" to mean "element name", or "elements with a given name".  This
> is consistent with DTDs, which constrain the content of elements
> according to their name.

"There are no types, just names" is close enough to "element types == 
element names" I won't quibble.

However, the notion that an element name is 1-1 with a content model + 
attribute list is only applicable to DTD validation.

Bob Foster
http://xmlbuddy.com/

• References:
  • Re: Can we treat XML elements and attributes as sets
    • From: richard@i... (Richard Tobin)

• Prev by Date: Re: indexing and querying XML (not XQuery)
• Next by Date: Re: indexing and querying XML (not XQuery)
• Previous by thread: Re: Can we treat XML elements and attributes as sets
• Next by thread: RE: Can we treat XML elements and attributes as sets
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread