• To: James Lindley Walford <jlw@i...>
• Subject: Re: SV: a useful naming convention
• From: James Fuller <jim.fuller@r...>
• Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2005 14:52:39 +0200
• Cc: "'Michael Kay'" <mike@s...>, "'Bryan Rasmussen'" <bry@i...>, xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <D45A5694803BE943BA46F9A7262BF83D01A1495C@i...>
• Organization: Webcomposite
• References: <D45A5694803BE943BA46F9A7262BF83D01A1495C@i...>
• Reply-to: jim.fuller@r...
• User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Macintosh/20050716)

James Walford wrote:

>Well XML Schemas are themselves XML documents, with the same (if not more
>complex) issues of readability. In fact it's XML Schemas I tend to be
>reading and wishing for a convention that would simplify things a little -
>especially (as Bryan mentioned) where an element may be referenced via an
>imported or included schema.
>
>  
>
opps....me being quite ignorant....this is one use case that I dont deal
with; having constrained my usage of XML schema to datatypes.

--Jim Fuller

• References:
  • SV: a useful naming convention
    • From: James Lindley Walford <jlw@i...>

• Prev by Date: SV: a useful naming convention
• Next by Date: RE: a useful naming convention
• Previous by thread: SV: a useful naming convention
• Next by thread: Re: SV: a useful naming convention
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread