• To: Barwell Jonathan <Jonathan.Barwell@a...>
• Subject: RE: a useful naming convention
• From: Bryan Rasmussen <bry@i...>
• Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2005 09:56:48 +0200
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <232210F7CE68FC419BDB5C08C3B82CBCF01DA6@u...>
• References: <232210F7CE68FC419BDB5C08C3B82CBCF01DA6@u...>
• User-agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.2

Citat Barwell Jonathan <Jonathan.Barwell@a...>:

> The one big problem I can see with this is that if you subsequently want to
> restructure your schema, e.g. a simple tag needs complex structure, then
> you
> not only have to restructure but you have to rename the tags as well.  This
> will look nice to start with but after a couple of evolutions there will be
> Upper and Lower case tags all over the place.
> 


Do you mean that your upper and lower case tags will not be sorted properly in
your schema?




-- 
Bryan Rasmussen

• References:
  • RE: a useful naming convention
    • From: Barwell Jonathan <Jonathan.Barwell@a...>

• Prev by Date: RE: a useful naming convention
• Next by Date: RE: a useful naming convention
• Previous by thread: RE: a useful naming convention
• Next by thread: RE: a useful naming convention
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread