• To: <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Faster XML (was: Why XML for Messaging?)
• From: "Ken North" <kennorth@s...>
• Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2005 16:32:41 -0700
• References: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE07206FA3@h...> <200506020736.31617.david.lyon@c...>

David Lyons wrote:
> Also add:
>
>   o A faster XML

A few weeks ago you implied that firmnware and custom silicon was an old school
approach that doesn't merit much discussion today -- when plumbers have a 2.4
GHz PC.

I don't see silicon solutions (ASICs, custom boards) as dead technology. Several
companies have taken that approach to XML acceleration. One company claims to
have a board that's the equivalent of 20 Xeon servers.


======== Ken North ===========
www.WebServicesSummit.com
www.SQLSummit.com
www.GridSummit.com

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Faster XML (was: Why XML for Messaging?)
    • From: David Lyon <david.lyon@c...>

• References:
  • Why XML for Messaging?
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <len.bullard@i...>
  • Re: Why XML for Messaging?
    • From: David Lyon <david.lyon@c...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Why XML for Messaging?
• Next by Date: Re: XPath and XSD/RNG
• Previous by thread: Re: Why XML for Messaging?
• Next by thread: Re: Faster XML (was: Why XML for Messaging?)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread