• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Another Microsoft XML patent
• From: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@r...>
• Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2005 14:53:37 -0700
• In-reply-to: <42A1D07F.5030002@o...>
• References: <F00F0521BE28134DA357DC1DF7475B9901AAA889@t...> <42A1D07F.5030002@o...>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax)

Oh, goody. And it's a good thing this passes the tests for obviousness 
and lack of prior art. What's next? Do we get to watch MS sue Sun for 
creating JAXB?

-- Ron

Bob Foster wrote:

> Noted without comment:
> 
> http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=/netahtml/search-bool.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&co1=AND&d=ptxt&s1=microsoft.ASNM.&s2=xml.ABST.&OS=AN/microsoft+AND+ABST/xml&RS=AN/microsoft+AND+ABST/xml 

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Another Microsoft XML patent
    • From: "Ken North" <kennorth@s...>
  • Re: Another Microsoft XML patent
    • From: Bob Foster <bob@o...>

• References:
  • schema-aware XML parser (java heap error)
    • From: Farid.Mahini@L...
  • Another Microsoft XML patent
    • From: Bob Foster <bob@o...>

• Prev by Date: Your PayPal Billing Information records are out of date. Please update them immediately to restore your account.
• Next by Date: Re: Another Microsoft XML patent
• Previous by thread: RE: Another Microsoft XML patent
• Next by thread: Re: Another Microsoft XML patent
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread