• To: "'Bryan Rasmussen'" <bry@i...>, <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: ISO 11179
• From: "Marc de Graauw" <marc@m...>
• Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 12:12:21 +0200
• In-reply-to: <1118392275.42a94fd39cfcd@h...>
• Thread-index: AcVtl4sItj7SgU3hQ0yRF4yIfb9FJwADSgbg

|  Please, any commentaries on ISO 11179 usage either for or against. 
|  
|  Bryan Rasmussen

I work on a project which uses the UBL Naming & Design Rules. Those are
based on the ebXML CCTS, which in turn is based on ISO 11179 (which as such
does not contain anything about XML). So I need to read and understand:

ISO 11179 Part 1 - 32 pages
ISO 11179 Part 2 - 16 pages
ISO 11179 Part 3 - 108 pages
ISO 11179 Part 4 - 16 pages
ISO 11179 Part 5 - 20 pages
ISO 11179 Part 6 - 72 pages
ebXML Core Components Technical Specification - 113 pages
UBL Naming & Design Rules - 104 pages

So I have one critique: bloat.

Marc

(Now, I could count the pages for this other project where I have to
understand XML + XSD + SOAP + WSDL + WS-Security + WS-Reliability + ... ,
come to think of it, the naming stuff above might not be that bad at all :-)
  

• References:
  • ISO 11179
    • From: Bryan Rasmussen <bry@i...>

• Prev by Date: ISO 11179
• Next by Date: RE: ISO 11179
• Previous by thread: ISO 11179
• Next by thread: RE: ISO 11179
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread