[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]


* Jeff Rafter <lists@j...> [2005-06-06 11:14]:
> 
> >If the patent in question is indeed bogus,
> >look to the USPTO's incompetence, not some evil plotting, for the
> >source of the problem.
> 
> Yes, that is what I am looking at. There can be no other possible 
> answer. Apparently they look in cookbooks and old sock piles for prior 
> art on software patents. Maybe someone should nudge them and point 
> toward Google.
> 
> Step 1: Take the title of the patent and copy it.
> Step 2: Paste it into the Google search bar.
> Step 3: Click the I'm feeling lucky button.
> Step 4: Print.
> Step 5: Send to patent applicant with denial letter.
> 
> Hmmm, that process definitely looks patentable.

    Definately patentable, except a little to specifc. If you could
    replace Google search bar, I'm feeling lucky, with Internet
    searching aparatus, then you'd have a business process.

    A Method for Verification of Patent Claims Using an Internet
    Searching Aparatus

    Now please let me in on some the royalties you'll be getting
    from the USPTO.

--
Alan Gutierrez - alan@e...
    - http://engrm.com/blogometer/index.html
    - http://engrm.com/blogometer/rss.2.0.xml

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member