• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Is XLink Dead? Apparently Not
• From: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@a...>
• Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 17:40:52 +1000
• In-reply-to: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE072070BF@h...>
• References: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE072070BF@h...>
• User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.6 (X11/20040502)

Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:

>After the thread a while back about the 
>death of XLink, I keep finding examples 
>of it being cited, particularly in the 
>OGC literature.
>
>It seems it lives. 
>
Our new product, Schema Management Tool[1], uses XLink extensively
under the hood.  (Or, at least, the PageSeeder[2] collaborative environment
that the Schema Management Tool is based on uses XLink extensively under
the hood.)

The XLinks are not complicated (no ranges, AFAIK) but are multiway.
All annotation threads, issues tracking, and references to attached data is
done using XLink.

Cheers
Rick Jelliffe

[1] http://www.topologi.com/resources/pdfs/SchemaManagementToolBrochure.pdf
[2] http://www.weborganic.com/

• References:
  • Is XLink Dead? Apparently Not
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <len.bullard@i...>

• Prev by Date: XML Digital Signature
• Next by Date: RE: XML Digital Signature
• Previous by thread: XML Digital Signature
• Next by thread: RE: XML Digital Signature
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread